It has an affidavit, MUST be real. ha

[GrayGhost]

http://hartford.craigslist.org/clt/2946460334.html

Opinions?:)

[steve B]

The affadavit does say it's a"true and correct reproduction"

I saw a bunch of stuff like that at a flea market in CT, maybe early 90's? They look great from 10ft away, but once you hold them it's obvious they're prints of autographed pictures. The ones I saw there was a Ruth, and maybe 4-5 others.

The ones I saw were only $50, I guess I should have bought them :)

Steve B
http://hartford.craigslist.org/clt/2946460334.html

Opinions?:)

[toyman55]

Mantle's autograph in 1953 was totally different that what is showing on the photograph.

[RichardSimon]

The whole thing is a crock.
Mantle's autograph in 1953 is totally different than the one pictured, you are absolutely right Shale.
And the affidavit states it is a reproduction.
So you are being offered a repro of a forgery for $500 OBO.
What a steal!!!

[Wymers Auction]

Or best offer could mean $1 I guess.