Goodwin & Co. Winnings

[Vintagecatcher]

I picked up George Gibson's teammate, Paddy O'Connor, in one of my favorite sets: The 1910 D322 Tip Top set. I regret not picking one up at my first National in Cleveland in 1997.

Patrick

[tinkertoeverstochance]

I won the D322 Wilson and Flynn

[CMIZ5290]

There were some cards that i am still overwhelmed at what they brought:

T206 psa 7 hal chase $5100!
T206 sgc 50 (rounded corners, card looks more like a 40) tinker, cycle 460 back, $4400!
T206 PSA 5 evers, sov 460 back, $3600!

Don't know what i'm missing, but these did not make any sense to me.... All Master set collectors, please call me for a tremendous savings!!

[Guttapercha]

I missed out/out bid on a couple items, but seems to be the 1933 Goudey Napoleon Lajoie went for cheaper than I thought. Anyone's thoughts on that? Isn't this one of the more sought after cards?

[Runscott]

There were some cards that i am still overwhelmed at what they brought:

T206 psa 7 hal chase $5100!
T206 sgc 50 (rounded corners, card looks more like a 40) tinker, cycle 460 back, $4400!
T206 PSA 5 evers, sov 460 back, $3600!

Don't know what i'm missing, but these did not make any sense to me.... All Master set collectors, please call me for a tremendous savings!!

+1, especially on Chase.

I picked up one card.

[olrac44]

I think the Lajoie went cheaper than the past but I think with many auctions coming up if it's not at the top of your list $35K could fill some major wants in your collection.

I picked up one T-205. I should have bid on one or two more but like I said with many auctions coming up, I'm trying not spend too much now and regret it later when Robert Edwards and SCP coimes out.

[kcohen]

I didn't win anything. I dropped out for the Zeenut Gomez, would love to have had it. After B-L and Legendary, I finally exercised some self-control, even though self-control generally has no role to play in this hobby.

[tbob]

I decided to start working on a new set- the 1933 George Miller. It is such an odd looking set that it's beautiful :D

[paul]

I picked up my first Diaz Cigarettes card from Cuba, the Carl Mays.

[rhettyeakley]

I missed out/out bid on a couple items, but seems to be the 1933 Goudey Napoleon Lajoie went for cheaper than I thought. Anyone's thoughts on that? Isn't this one of the more sought after cards?

You have an interesting user name, are you a dentist or a vintage golf fan?

[bbsports]

Everybody's talking about the Lajoie selling for a cheap price. How about the 1934 Goudey Gehrig card #37 sold for 55K in a 9? I believe the SMR is around $80K. Do you think being it was graded by SGC have anything to do with it?

[CMIZ5290]

Bill, you are absolutely right, sgc graded had everything to do with it.

[Guttapercha]

Rhett, Very good. dentist. Tried the golf thing. Doesn't work for me.

[oldjudge]

Over the last year I have tried to reacquire the Hartlands I had as a kid (Mantle, Berra and Maris). Last night I picked up the Maris (I had picked up the Mantle and the Berra previously). I also picked up the Williams and the Mays so they would have friends to play with.

[joeadcock]

19 cent cabinet I pick

[bcbgcbrcb]

What does everyone think of the 1869 Cincy CDV that sold for just a little over $10K?

[Leon]

What does everyone think of the 1869 Cincy CDV that sold for just a little over $10K?

My thought was it was about right for what it is..blank back and no names or advertising. Nice card though......Any one with some knowledge of them could differ....

[oldjudge]

Leon hit it on the nose. The CdVs were issued over several years by various entities. The only CdV that can be tied to 1869 is the one with the Chadwick book ad on the back. This one had a decent image, but was trimmed and, as Leon said, was blank backed.

[pcoz]

My first Ruth item to add to the collection...

[bcbgcbrcb]

Very nice card, Pete. That one brought quite a price.

[bijoem]

awesome card Pete.

Congratulations!

[GaryPassamonte]

Not to hijack this thread, but can't some others be dated to 1869 based on the Peck and Snyder ad on the reverse and which Nassau St address is listed?

[oldjudge]

Gary---As long as it is not 126 Nassau. That would preclude it from being 1869. Also, a different address would make it pre-1871, not necessarily 1869.

[Leon]

Gary---As long as it is not 126 Nassau. That would preclude it from being 1869. Also, a different address would make it pre-1871, not necessarily 1869.

Peck and Snyder moved to the 126 address on or about MAY 1, 1870. That being said the photos and/or cards could have actually been manufactured before that date but not distributed, or made, until then. It would be interesting to know the production process of the cards. When were the photos taken? Could the photos have been taken in 1868-1870 and used on the cards after that? The actual photos used for the cards are the same.

[GaryPassamonte]

I believe the 22 Ann St address on Peck and Snyder CdVs represents the earliest issue.

[barrysloate]

The photo had to be taken in 1869 because the 1868 and 1870 teams had different players.

[Ben Yourg]

Is this card that rare,to bring that much money?

[calvindog]

http://www.goodwinandco.com/LotDetail.aspx?lotid=22247&searchby=0&searchvalue=None&page=0&sortby=0&displayby=2&lotsperpage=100&category=1&seo=1907-09-Dietsche-Ty-Cobb-Fielding-Detroit-Tigers-Postcards-PSA-5-EX

Here's the other PSA 5:

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/2909248245/" title="1907 AC Dietsche PC 765-1-1 Fielding by calvindog65, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3118/2909248245_6eedc07b2f_o.jpg" width="500" height="862" alt="1907 AC Dietsche PC 765-1-1 Fielding"></a>

Kind of hard to believe they're the same grade.

[Runscott]

Here's the other PSA 5:


Kind of hard to believe they're the same grade.

Gorgeous card.

[ValKehl]

I also picked up a 1924 Diaz card - Allan Russell of the Wash. Senators. I am looking to acquire the other Senators in this set - anyone have any they are willing to sell or trade?
Val

[benjulmag]

Inasmuch as the Red Stockings cdv was blank-backed, it is very possibly a pirate cdv, which would make it a second generation photo. Off the top of my head, I can think of only one other blank-backed baseball cdv (Harvard c. 1866), all the others having studio information on the verso. If the cdv was a legitimate issue, I don't know why the studio that produced it would not adhere it to a studio mount with its name identified on the verso.

If in fact it is a second-generation cdv, its resolution would be inferior and its value would be expected to be considerably less than if it was first-generation.

[Ben Yourg]

I was surprised this card went to over $800.00?

[oldjudge]

Good point Corey, although the photo did not look bad.

[bcbgcbrcb]

Thanks for the info, Corey, great insight.