Seeking opinions on Lou Gehrig signed ball...

[Kzoo]

Hello all, I'm looking for opinions on this 'Lou Gehrig' signed baseball. I purchased this ball via Ebay in early January of the year 2000, from Inside the Park Collectibles. I've never had it examined by any 'experts' like JSA or PSA. The ball itself is obviously in 'used' condition and heavily worn. Opinions on the signature from the Net54 community would be greatly appreciated. Thanks......Matt

[MGHPro]

Im no expert, but I don't like it.

[roarfrom34]

unfortunately no good IMO

[perezfan]

Not a fan of this one either... sorry :(

[Big Dave]

Any particular reasons why this is no good?


http://www.amazon.com/b?%5Fencoding=UTF8&site-redirect=&node=256994011&tag=colmor-20&linkCode=ur2&camp=1789&creative=9325

[Lou Criscione]

I think you are mistaken. We (Inside the Park Collectibles) never sold you this or any other lou Gehrig signed baseball. In fact, in our over 25 years in the hobby- we have never owned or sold a Lou Gehrig ball. Please look back on your records and post the proper seller.

Thanks!
Lou
Inside the Park Collectibles

[Kzoo]

I'm not mistaken at all, Lou. I made sure before listing this post that I had my facts straight. Here's a scan of my original receipt from Inside the Park Collectibles on January 10th, 2000 noting a purchase of a 'GEHRIG BALL'. Also, after receiving the ball, I left positive feedback on 1/19/00 for 'yanksfan' ('Inside the Park Collectibles' user name) regarding ebay item #229665613 (this ball). My first post accurately listed Inside the Park Collectibles as the ebay seller I purchased this ball from.

Honestly, all I was looking for with this thread was some opinions on the signature from the forum, as in the past several years I've began to question it. I was hoping these comments might help sway my decision in whether to send it in to the 'experts' for examination.....or save a couple hundred bucks. I've received a few good replies from net54 members.....Thanks!!

[GrayGhost]

For what its worth, it doesn't look good to me either.

[gnaz01]

I'm not mistaken at all, Lou. I made sure before listing this post that I had my facts straight. Here's a scan of my original receipt from Inside the Park Collectibles on January 10th, 2000 noting a purchase of a 'GEHRIG BALL'. Also, after receiving the ball, I left positive feedback on 1/19/00 for 'yanksfan' ('Inside the Park Collectibles' user name) regarding ebay item #229665613 (this ball). My first post accurately listed Inside the Park Collectibles as the ebay seller I purchased this ball from.

Honestly, all I was looking for with this thread was some opinions on the signature from the forum, as in the past several years I've began to question it. I was hoping these comments might help sway my decision in whether to send it in to the 'experts' for examination.....or save a couple hundred bucks. I've received a few good replies from net54 members.....Thanks!!

No offense, but let's see Lou explain this :confused:

It clearly states ITPC on the credit card receipt, unless there is another explanation, ITPC sold the ball in my opinion!

[perezfan]

Any particular reasons why this is no good?


http://www.amazon.com/b?%5Fencoding=UTF8&site-redirect=&node=256994011&tag=colmor-20&linkCode=ur2&camp=1789&creative=9325

I'll refrain from commenting on who sold the ball, as it appearss to be self-evident.

But to answer your question, I don't like the letter formation (especially the big "G"). There was a fellow named Robert Prouty about a decade ago, who was peddling big name fakes by the truckload. I forget the name of his company, but he had an impressive website with prices just low ebough to lure unsuspecting and/or novice collectors into making a big purchase. Prouty's name was later listed as one of the "bad apples" in Operation Bullpen.

I'll stop rambling... just wanted to say that this ball has the exact characteristics one of his Gehrigs.

[BrandonG]

I'll refrain from commenting on who sold the ball, as it appearss to be self-evident.

But to answer your question, I don't like the letter formation (especially the big "G"). There was a fellow named Robert Prouty about a decade ago, who was peddling big name fakes by the truckload. I forget the name of his company, but he had an impressive website with prices just low ebough to lure unsuspecting and/or novice collectors into making a big purchase. Prouty's name was later listed as one of the "bad apples" in Operation Bullpen.

I'll stop rambling... just wanted to say that this ball has the exact characteristics one of his Gehrigs.

I completely agree, my first opinion was that the ink looked like the same type that he used to sign everything with. I know that sounds weird but most of his signatures were a glossy faded brown and appear to be slowly "painted" on the ball. Here is a picture of a Cobb he did, you can see similar stokes and blotching. Just my opinion, by no means an expert on signatures.

[sports-rings]

I hope Lou will do the right thing and refund your money. If not, this could make for an interesting story on the autograph / hobby news sites.

[novakjr]

Why do I get the feeling that Lou wrote up that credit card receipt himself? I'm thinking the use of "Gehrig Ball" in both Lou's post and on the receipt gives it away. Could just be coincidence though.

Either way, I've always understood ITPC to be pretty reputable, and I wouldn't necessarily hold this against them. Nobody's perfect all the time, and we've all fallen victim to forgeries and the such at one time or another. Buyers, sellers, dealers, whoever, we've all fallen victim...It's just the nature of this hobby, we're an easy prey for scumbags. It happens.

That being said, I put alot of stock into how a person handles themselves upon finding out they have bad items, or even unintentionally passed bad items onto someone else. I'm interested in seeing how this plays out.. Whoever ends up with this thing in the long run, please make sure it never sees the light of day again..

[Lou Criscione]

Wow- I guess I'm gettiing feeble minded in my old age. I honestly didn't remember that ball being our's- but that certainly is my receipt and hand-writing. My apologies. We don't deal with too many autographs and I sell everything in good faith. Now- 11 years later- we only sell autographed items that have been authenticated by a professional 3rd party.
We will of course offer a money back guarantee if it comes back bad from a
top authenticator(JSA or PSA).
Lou

[Leon]

Wow- I guess I'm gettiing feeble minded in my old age. I honestly didn't remember that ball being our's- but that certainly is my receipt and hand-writing. My apologies. We don't deal with too many autographs and I sell everything in good faith. Now- 11 years later- we only sell autographed items that have been authenticated by a professional 3rd party.
We will of course offer a money back guarantee if it comes back bad from a
top authenticator(JSA or PSA).
Lou

Lou & ITPC = Good Guys

We have said it a million times but it bears repeating. When there are no issues every one can be a winner. When there is an issue, how it is handled, separates the winners from losers. regards

[murphusa]

I for one thinks this whole thing kinda sucks.

I have done business in the past with Lou and his company. He has sold me things and I have sold him things. Knowing he is a member of this site and a regular poster, I would have emailed/PM'ed him first that I was going to ask an opinion of the group on a ball that came from him.

Going about it this way is just wrong.


Jim Murphy
Philadelphia Bat Company

[scmavl]

Thumbs up to Lou for offering to do the right thing.

I for one thinks this whole thing kinda sucks.

I have done business in the past with Lou and his company. He has sold me things and I have sold him things. Knowing he is a member of this site and a regular poster, I would have emailed/PM'ed him first that I was going to ask an opinion of the group on a ball that came from him.

Going about it this way is just wrong.


Jim Murphy
Philadelphia Bat Company

[sports-rings]

Lou,

thanks for standing up! Wish there were more people in our hobby like you!

[scooter729]

I for one thinks this whole thing kinda sucks.

I have done business in the past with Lou and his company. He has sold me things and I have sold him things. Knowing he is a member of this site and a regular poster, I would have emailed/PM'ed him first that I was going to ask an opinion of the group on a ball that came from him.

Going about it this way is just wrong.


Jim Murphy
Philadelphia Bat Company

In defense of the original poster, he started off just by asking for opinions on the ball, not slamming Lou or his company.

It was only when Lou responded that he never sold the ball, that the original poster added the scan of the receipt (kudos to him for saving it for 11 years!!).

I didn't see it as doing anything wrong by the original poster.

[roarfrom34]

I'd like to be at the point in the memorabilia hobby that I would have no recollection of ever selling a single signed Gehrig ball......

[novakjr]

In defense of the original poster, he started off just by asking for opinions on the ball, not slamming Lou or his company.

It was only when Lou responded that he never sold the ball, that the original poster added the scan of the receipt (kudos to him for saving it for 11 years!!).

I didn't see it as doing anything wrong by the original poster.

Exactly. I don't think the OP was trying to put down ITPC. I took it as more of him giving some insight into the background of the item.

[Shoeless Moe]

I'd like to be at the point in the memorabilia hobby that I would have no recollection of ever selling a single signed Gehrig ball......

Me too.......Tou che'!

W/o that receipt.......this thread could have gone quite a different way.

[HexsHeroes]

.

. . . that KZOO (Matt) had the receipt from year 2000. I've met many a serious collector who file (dispose) receipts away, only to never find them again.

I, myself, have kept most/all receipts, and photo copies of original correspondence. If only I put in as much effort organizing those letters and receipts, as I did my hobby treasures. There's still time.

[Kzoo]

In defense of the original poster, he started off just by asking for opinions on the ball, not slamming Lou or his company.

It was only when Lou responded that he never sold the ball, that the original poster added the scan of the receipt (kudos to him for saving it for 11 years!!).

I didn't see it as doing anything wrong by the original poster.

Thanks Scott for the backup.

As stated earlier, my goal for this thread was to hopefully get a feel from the forum whether the signature might be good or bad.....comments either way were fine as they would help with my decision of shipping it off to the 'experts'. If the majority of the feedback from the forum came back negative (as it has), I would save the authentication fees and write the ball off as a 'stupid tax' (as financial guru Dave Ramsey would say), learn a valuable lesson and regret not doing more 'homework' on the signature back in early 2000. That's it, period.

I haven't contacted Lou directly yet and haven't spoken to him since he wrote up the receipt for the ball over the phone back in 2000, but I'm planning on contacting him off the forum within the next couple days. I never had negative intentions with this thread towards Lou or his company and NEVER had the goal of a refund in mind (Holy Crap, it's been 11 years!!). I praise Lou for standing behind the ball now, as that says a lot about his character. Personally, as a collector with a young family, I have limited funds for collecting & authenticating and at this point, I definitely wouldn't turn down anything monetarily offered by Lou (if JSA or PSA were to 'fail' the signature and then send me a letter of rejection.....as I would fully expect, now.....a waste of money IMO).

As a side note from my perspective, I've never heard anything negative about ITPC in my past 13 years in the hobby after college, I always enjoyed reading their ads in SCD and I wouldn't hesitate from buying anything from them in the future....they always advertise cool stuff.

I'm expecting (depending on JSA/PSA) the fate of this 'Gehrig ball' to be death at some point in the near future....I'll keep you posted.

Again, thanks to the forum for the response,

Matt

[murphusa]

Sorry but the poster clearly put Lou in the spotlight by saying the ball came from him. Lou did what he should have and defended himself and then the poster pulled his rabbit out of his hat by producing the receipt.

I honestly believe that Lou did not remember making the sale as autographs are not his business. Most autographs I have seen he had for sale where Hartlands that had signatures.

If the poster was as genuine as all of you want to make him out to be, he should have produced the receipt in an email or PM instead of throwing it back in Lou's face.

Again, sorry, but next time any of you are put on the spot I hope you act as good about it as Lou has.

BTW, If I was standing next to Lou on the street right now he would not know who I am

[Lou Criscione]

Hi Guys! Thanks for the kind words of several of the posters. I have sold so many items over the last 25 years that many have become a blur. There are no hard feelings on my part for the original poster- I would be upset too if I had bought an expensive autograph that may not be an original. I guess I should have remembered a Lou Gehrig ball - but I honestly don't. If it comes back as bad, I will gladly refund the purchase price and display it on my mantle and pretend it's real. Most of my friends will be impressed anyway.
Lou
P.S. I'll be a little shameless and tell you guys we are having an auction ending June 3, You can view the auction at our web site: www.insidetheparkcollectibles.com All the autograph items come with COA's (lol)

[mdschulze]

Sorry but the poster clearly put Lou in the spotlight by saying the ball came from him. Lou did what he should have and defended himself and then the poster pulled his rabbit out of his hat by producing the receipt.

I honestly believe that Lou did not remember making the sale as autographs are not his business. Most autographs I have seen he had for sale where Hartlands that had signatures.

If the poster was as genuine as all of you want to make him out to be, he should have produced the receipt in an email or PM instead of throwing it back in Lou's face.

Again, sorry, but next time any of you are put on the spot I hope you act as good about it as Lou has.

BTW, If I was standing next to Lou on the street right now he would not know who I am

I don't know Lou or Matt but I do know this forum is full of threads pertaining to bad sellers, ebay scams, and fake autos/cards. A lot of us do not have the expertise as some of the other members here and rely on their expert advice.... for learning purposes. I personally do not have a problem "outing" a potential bad seller. Maybe I purchased something from the same seller a few years ago and need to recheck the validity of the item. Had Matt (and others) not posted their experience(s) publicly, how would I know any different?

Lou publicly claimed that it was his mistake and he would make it right... no PR harm done at all. If anything, this thread will likely help future sales for Lou... everyone can see that he backs his items and displays good customer service.

I personally support everyone who suspects or has been victim of fraudulent activities within the hobby to make those experiences publicly known... it helps us all out in the long run!

[thenavarro]

Matt,

IMO, you shouldn't have to spend $200 plus shipping both ways in order to get a refund on that ball, just in order to get a "questionable authenticity" from PSA/DNA or JSA.

You might ask the seller if their are some cheaper alternatives they would accept for refund. For example, Richard Simon is great, and I could be wrong, but I don't think he'd charge you anywhere near that amount to come on this thread, take a quick look, and email you both to let y'all know that it's no good.

If the original seller is going to insist on a PSA/DNA or JSA "denial", then call Roy Alcala at PSA, and explain the situation to him and he might be willing to cut you a nice discount. Roy has always been very fair to me with pricing, and if you explain that you have a bad ball and the seller is requiring you to get it "un-authenticated" in order to get a refund, then he might be willing to work with you.

Or, another option that the seller should be willing to accept IMO, would be a PSA/DNA quick opinion "questionable authenticity" and that would only cost you $7.49. You simply place it on ebay with a high starting bid, put a clear picture, request the quick opinion from PSA/DNA, and you should have your results in about 48 hours or less. If anyone happens to bid, just cancel the bids.

Take care,

Mike

[jg8422]

Thanks for being a stand-up guy Lou! I have purchased several vintage bobbleheads from you and will certainly buy more in the future.

[Mr. Zipper]

Or, another option that the seller should be willing to accept IMO, would be a PSA/DNA quick opinion "questionable authenticity" and that would only cost you $7.49. You simply place it on ebay with a high starting bid, put a clear picture, request the quick opinion from PSA/DNA, and you should have your results in about 48 hours or less. If anyone happens to bid, just cancel the bids.


<thumbs up>

I was going to suggest the same thing. It would hurt to sink another $200 on an item you are almost certain is bad.

[Mr. Zipper]

I don't know Lou or Matt but I do know this forum is full of threads pertaining to bad sellers, ebay scams, and fake autos/cards. A lot of us do not have the expertise as some of the other members here and rely on their expert advice.... for learning purposes. I personally do not have a problem "outing" a potential bad seller. Maybe I purchased something from the same seller a few years ago and need to recheck the validity of the item. Had Matt (and others) not posted their experience(s) publicly, how would I know any different?

Lou publicly claimed that it was his mistake and he would make it right... no PR harm done at all. If anything, this thread will likely help future sales for Lou... everyone can see that he backs his items and displays good customer service.

I personally support everyone who suspects or has been victim of fraudulent activities within the hobby to make those experiences publicly known... it helps us all out in the long run!

This is such good advice. :)

More than once I had to revisit items that I previously thought were slam dunk good because I heard information about the seller long after the initial sale.

In my short tenure here, I have shared my bad Mantles and the Marino No Hit Kings ball. Embarassing as it may be, hopefully it will help others.

When I get the courage up, I have a few more question marks to share... but I can only take so much bad news in one calendar quarter. :D

[thecatspajamas]

I don't know Lou or Matt but I do know this forum is full of threads pertaining to bad sellers, ebay scams, and fake autos/cards. A lot of us do not have the expertise as some of the other members here and rely on their expert advice.... for learning purposes. I personally do not have a problem "outing" a potential bad seller. Maybe I purchased something from the same seller a few years ago and need to recheck the validity of the item. Had Matt (and others) not posted their experience(s) publicly, how would I know any different?

I personally don't have a problem with outing fraudulent sellers, but I DO have a problem with outing a seller before they've been shown to be fraudulent. I think if the OP wanted to get a truly unbiased opinion of the authenticity of the autograph, his original post should have shown only the ball and not named where it came from. If he's only trying to decide whether or not it's a waste of money to send it in for authentication, then who sold it to him is irrelevent. Once he's gotten several opinions and checked with the seller on how they want to handle the situation, then report back on what an upstanding guy he is or, if there are problems, THEN call the bum out. But when you name names in the first post, you are automatically putting the seller on the defensive and potentially tainting any feedback about the signature itself.

It's all water under the bridge now, and I will add my applause to the others going out to Lou for his handling of the situation. But I don't think it's appropriate in these situations to get out the spotlights and air horns as an opening move. Later on, sure, we should all be informed when there's a rotten apple, but for goodness sake have some proof before you start using names. Suppose Lou hadn't been around to give his side? Just because there was no PR damage this time doesn't mean that this sequence of events should be accepted.

Am I off in my thinking on this? It just seems like gentlemen should settle matters between themselves and only resort to public accusations when those private conversations break down. I can't imagine this thread would have gone as smoothly if Lou had not piped up as soon as he had, and I don't think a seller should be required to patrol the boards for their name just in case they have to defend themselves.

Lance

[Shoeless Moe]

....how do u not remember a Gehrig ball.......it's not like it was Richie Zisk.....Lou friggin Gehrig.

They even have the same 1st name for pete sakes! and both from NY, c'mon!

[canjond]

I personally don't have a problem with outing fraudulent sellers, but I DO have a problem with outing a seller before they've been shown to be fraudulent. I think if the OP wanted to get a truly unbiased opinion of the authenticity of the autograph, his original post should have shown only the ball and not named where it came from. If he's only trying to decide whether or not it's a waste of money to send it in for authentication, then who sold it to him is irrelevent. Once he's gotten several opinions and checked with the seller on how they want to handle the situation, then report back on what an upstanding guy he is or, if there are problems, THEN call the bum out. But when you name names in the first post, you are automatically putting the seller on the defensive and potentially tainting any feedback about the signature itself.

It's all water under the bridge now, and I will add my applause to the others going out to Lou for his handling of the situation. But I don't think it's appropriate in these situations to get out the spotlights and air horns as an opening move. Later on, sure, we should all be informed when there's a rotten apple, but for goodness sake have some proof before you start using names. Suppose Lou hadn't been around to give his side? Just because there was no PR damage this time doesn't mean that this sequence of events should be accepted.

Am I off in my thinking on this? It just seems like gentlemen should settle matters between themselves and only resort to public accusations when those private conversations break down. I can't imagine this thread would have gone as smoothly if Lou had not piped up as soon as he had, and I don't think a seller should be required to patrol the boards for their name just in case they have to defend themselves.

Lance


I actually think this cuts both ways. Had everything been handled back channel, Lou would not have had the opportunity to show what a stand-up business he is running. Look, most of us have had bad things pass through us. Seeing how Lou handled this situation, to me, made him a more attractive option for future purchases. I'd much rather spend my money with the good guys than those who feign responsibility.

[thecatspajamas]

I'm not saying that everything has to happen through the back channel. Post on the board and get everyone's opinions. No problems with that for sure. But if you're going to put someone's name out there, at least have the decency to give them a heads-up. By the OP's own admission he still has not contacted Lou personally to discuss this with him. I don't think he had bad intentions, but what if Lou had been out of town for a couple weeks and hadn't heard his name come up on the boards? I'm sure Lou would have handled the situation in the same upstanding manner once he was aware of it, but do you really think the crowd would have held onto their stones to wait and hear what Lou had to say on the matter before the accusations started to fly?

The fact that it worked out okay for Lou this time doesn't mean that the next stand-up guy to get thrown under the bus will come out so well. I for one would much rather have seen the OP's original post minus Lou's name, the opinions of knowledgable board members, and then a report from the OP or Lou on how they had worked the matter out and it was taken care of. Lou still comes up smelling like roses, but he would have to crawl out from under the bus to do so.

I don't mean to get preachy :D I just see a LOT of threads that start out similarly go south rather quickly, and sometimes I wonder if it's truly deserved.

And again, kudos to Lou for being a stand-up guy and dealing with this honorably. Even if the OP does wind up having to shell out for a full authentication, remember, THIS IS AN 11-YEAR-OLD TRANSACTION we're talking about! Even Wal-Mart won't take back something that was bought that long ago!

Lance

[Jewish-collector]

If the buyer would contact the seller privately & they solve the problem, then you would never hear about it. But, what usually happens is that they call the person out on the message board and then you get a 100 comments for the thread. This way is good entertainment.

:D:D:D:D:D

[mdschulze]

Even if the OP didn't post the seller's name in the original thread, someone would have asked (based on other threads). I think this would help identify problems in general anyway. "Hey I bought this item from ________. Does this item look genuine?'

"No, it doesn't look genuine but I've bought items from ________ and never had any problems" OR "Your item looks good but I bought an item from _______ and it turned out to be a reproduction... you might want to have it checked."

[novakjr]

Even if the OP didn't post the seller's name in the original thread, someone would have asked (based on other threads). I think this would help identify problems in general anyway. "Hey I bought this item from ________. Does this item look genuine?'

"No, it doesn't look genuine but I've bought items from ________ and never had any problems" OR "Your item looks good but I bought an item from _______ and it turned out to be a reproduction... you might want to have it checked."

My thoughts exactly.

[stone193]

....how do u not remember a Gehrig ball.......it's not like it was Richie Zisk.....Lou friggin Gehrig.

They even have the same 1st name for pete sakes! and both from NY, c'mon!

Isn't this a bit harsh?

I've done some business with Lou and believe he's top notch. In fact, I made a mistake on a purchase with him and he went out of his way to insure I was satisfied.

Just like some feel that the OP posted this item honestly - without an agenda...

With all due respect - if Lou said he didn't remember - why not give him the same deference?

[smtjoy]

I for one am glad threads like this get posted, I like knowing who will work things out and who will not, even if sometimes they turn ugly.

I have never purchased from Lou (or heard of him before this thread) but after this I will check his auctions out for sure and will not be afraid to make a purchase. We need more sellers like this!

[J.McMurry]

This is not aimed at anyone involved with this situation,but something that should be made clear for ANY transaction involving autographs, and that is a legit Autograph is a legit autograph FOREVER. Doesnt matter if it was bought yesterday or eleven years ago, A good dealer will refund the purchase price(to the original buyer) anytime on an item that has been proven to be fake.

[Kzoo]

Hello all..........Lou and I have come to a private conclusion regarding this Gehrig ball. Lou has been very professional and polite, extremely honest and more than generous over the past couple days. His character, to those not familiar with him or ITPC, is top notch. Thanks to those that supported each of us positively.

Have a great Memorial Day weekend!!

Matt

[Spartan833]

Great news Matt! Glad things worked out! I hear you are going to the National with us!

Lou, before this thread I have never done any business with you, however, I will now keep an eye out on your auctions. Well done!

Cheers!

[jg8422]

Lou is the man! I have purchased a few of his vintage bobbleheads from him when he comes to the Philly area. Look forward to many more purchases from him. He took a lot of time educating me about vintage nodders.

-Jeff

[stone193]

Lou is the man! I have purchased a few of his vintage bobbleheads from him when he comes to the Philly area. Look forward to many more purchases from him. He took a lot of time educating me about vintage nodders.

-Jeff

Totally agree Jeff.

I recommend people consider checking out their auctions - as well as their store.