PDA

View Full Version : PSA 5 T206 Burchell???


tjb1952tjb
12-09-2010, 03:38 AM
http://cgi.ebay.com/T206-Fred-Burchell-Buffalo-Sweet-Caporal-PSA-5-EX-/140487152037?pt=US_Baseball&hash=item20b5afd1a5

Hard to believe this was graded a PSA 5.........
Here's my PSA 5 T206 Burchell for comparison...........

quinnsryche
12-09-2010, 07:03 AM
Prime example of why I dont trust PSA to accurately grade cards. I have come to accept the "buy the card, not the holder" philosophy.

T206Collector
12-09-2010, 09:11 AM
I've said it before and I'll say it again, my experience attempting to cross 40 PSA graded T206 cards (4s, 5s and 6s) into SGC holders was extremely educational and made me extremely wary of purchasing PSA graded T206 cards. In 10 examples, PSA missed creasing, wrinkles and/or trimming.

lharri3600
12-09-2010, 09:12 AM
me too!


Prime example of why I dont trust PSA to accurately grade cards. I have come to accept the "buy the card, not the holder" philosophy.

ChiefBenderForever
12-09-2010, 10:14 AM
Probably got graded by one of the guys they hired from BCCG

rp12367
12-09-2010, 04:05 PM
I brought a PSA 5 T212 Obak off e-bay a month or two ago it has more wrinkles in it than a Shar Pei. I don't trust PSA anymore either.

ctownboy
12-09-2010, 05:18 PM
Is everyone sure the PSA 5 card on eBay is even authentic? Whenever I see slightly rounded corners and brown staining, I think of the scam artists and their mugs filled with tea or coffee....

David

tjb1952tjb
12-10-2010, 01:53 AM
Thanks for your comments guys. I'm just over 85% complete conquering "the monster"......all PSA graded cards. I wish I had started with SGC graded cards, but it's too late and too cumbersome for me to change course now. I really prefer the look of SGC holders, and they seem to be more consistent in their grading standards. (Take note, those of you who may be newly bitten by "the monster").

fkw
12-10-2010, 02:04 AM
Looking at the back is easier to see the corners, the staining on front makes corners look worse.... but it still is NO 5 for sure. Id say 3.5

AndyG09
12-10-2010, 12:17 PM
Positively S***ty Accuracy, as usual.

teetwoohsix
12-11-2010, 11:56 AM
Positively S***ty Accuracy, as usual.

Nice !! Good one Andy :D

Clayton

AndyG09
12-11-2010, 12:02 PM
Nice !! Good one Andy :D

Clayton

Thank you very much, Clayton!

Andy