PDA

View Full Version : Isn't the lottery a better risk?


GrayGhost
09-10-2009, 02:13 PM
AS someone having financial issues, its amazes me as to why ANYone would bid anything on this? Just a conversation piece? Maybe some can give me their reasons, as I don't see anything gained by this, its easier to flush money down the john, if you have that much of it, or take a course in intelligence, if you are bidding for another reason.

http://cgi.ebay.com/BABE-RUTH-AUTOGRAPH-BASEBALL-REAL-OR-FAKE-DONT-KNOW_W0QQitemZ180405667685QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_De faultDomain_0?hash=item2a01040765&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14

birdman42
09-10-2009, 02:36 PM
Scott,

A good quality baseball will set you back ten bucks, so at $5.50 plus $3.50 postage you're ahead. Take it out in the back yard with the kids and knock it around until the cover falls off.

Bill

Chris Counts
09-10-2009, 04:58 PM
I never realized they had Sharpies when Babe Ruth was alive. That makes this ball even more special ...

GoldenAge50s
09-10-2009, 05:38 PM
I think that other sig is that famous pitcher Ryan Nolan. It's possible for him & the Babe to have signed at the same time as Ryan was born in 1947!

drc
09-10-2009, 05:56 PM
The lottery is a better bet, as there is 0% chance you will win an authentic Babe Ruth autographed baseball in that auction.

buymycards
09-10-2009, 07:12 PM
Leave him alone. At least his Kellogg's Tony the Tiger ball is legit.'

Rick

drc
09-10-2009, 08:08 PM
I'm not even 100% certain the autograph says 'Babe Ruth.'