Show us your BB card Uncut sheets, panels, etc. [Archive]

View Full Version : Show us your BB card Uncut sheets, panels, etc.

Archive

08-10-2007, 10:08 AM

Posted By: Ted Zanidakis1949 Bowman 3rd Series complete sheet of 36 cards....with color printing errors. <img src="http://www.freephotoserver.com/v001/tedzan/a49_3bowman.jpg"> TED Z

Archive

08-10-2007, 07:03 PM

Posted By: ScottDo Kelloggs and Hostess count? <img src="http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y133/scottopotamus/Nate%20Colbert/1973KelloggsTriPanel.jpg"> <img src="http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y133/scottopotamus/Nate%20Colbert/1975Hostess2.jpg"> Scott

Archive

08-10-2007, 08:05 PM

Posted By: AnthonyHere's a few of mine <img src="http://photos.imageevent.com/griffins/uncutsheets/icons/55DHsheet.tif.jpg"> <img src="http://photos.imageevent.com/griffins/uncutsheets/icons/57Sheet.tif.jpg"> <img src="http://photos.imageevent.com/griffins/uncutsheets/icons/62Topps.tif.jpg"> <img src="http://photos.imageevent.com/griffins/uncutsheets/icons/63FleerPanel.tif.jpg"> and one done by Keith Conforti- some Red Sox sport kings that never were, along with a bunch of other fantasy cards <img src="http://photos.imageevent.com/griffins/uncutsheets/large/Con40.tif.jpg">

Archive

08-10-2007, 08:12 PM

Posted By: Jason LW O W ! Ted, Anthony, those are extremely cool. I've never seen older uncut sheets like that. amazing stuff. and that 49 sheet has one of my bog guys in it (Campy!)... thanks!

Archive

08-10-2007, 08:16 PM

Posted By: Paul STed, I'm not sure because of the scan, but are those alot of the gray/slate backgrounds on the Bowman '49's? WOW, if so!!

Archive

08-10-2007, 09:13 PM

Posted By: Paul SThese are about the only thing I have uncut...even as a Jew I'm circumsized!

Archive

08-10-2007, 09:14 PM

Posted By: Paul Sand here's the scan (can't wait for the edit option to activate): <img src="http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z26/pspec/Topps_stamps_shettX2.jpg">

Archive

08-11-2007, 08:32 AM

Posted By: Marc S.<img src="http://baseballcardresource.com/img/55Bowman/55Bowman_SalesStrip_A.jpg"> <img src="http://baseballcardresource.com/img/55Bowman/55Bowman_SalesStrip_B.jpg">

Archive

08-11-2007, 08:35 AM

Posted By: AnthonyDoes that make about a dozen of those Marc? Are they all different?

Archive

08-11-2007, 08:38 AM

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisAll the cards that are not RED & BLUE backgrounds are SLATE's. There are 17 of them. In the VCBC magazine, some years back, I wrote an article on the 1949 Bowman color errors. Did you get a chance to read it ? I list all the SLATE cards that can be possibly found in this set. Most of them are the tough Hi#s (#145 - 240 and the 12 variations). TED Z

Archive

08-11-2007, 08:40 AM

Posted By: Ted Zanidakis<img src="http://www.freephotoserver.com/v001/tedzan/bowman48_2.jpg"> TED Z

Archive

08-11-2007, 08:59 AM

Posted By: Paul STed, I was out of collecting for very many years until just a few months ago when I registered on NT54, so I'm not aware of your article. Will see if it's available anywhere. I did post my only slate one yesterday on this forum (Schoendienst), and about a month ago or so on the pre-war, where you commented that you'd hadn't seen it before. Stuff on here is just amazing to me. - Paul

Archive

08-11-2007, 09:32 AM

Posted By: Marc S.I think it is less than a dozen at this point. I do have a double of one of the panels -- surprisingly, it came from the same seller on Ebay in a single lot about five years ago. Just weird to see two carbon copies of the panel from the same guy in the same auction, especially given how hard the actual panels are to find. The cool thing about the panel I showed above is that it is the second one I have now that features two Hall of Famers on the same panel. It is possible that there is a third panel that has two Hall of Famers (Kaline and Campanella), but I have not confirmed such a panel to exist. Unfortunately, there is so little information known about these, that I usually just defer to myself in defining population / panels / singles ~ms

Archive

08-11-2007, 09:58 AM

Posted By: Ted Zanidakis<img src="http://www.freephotoserver.com/v001/tedzan/abowman4th49.jpg"> TED Z

Archive

08-11-2007, 10:01 AM

Posted By: AnthonyTed, the color on that one is amazing! Do you have the entire set uncut?

Archive

08-11-2007, 01:23 PM

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisI wish I did....I have three of the 7 sheets and I know of the 2nd (cards #37 - 72) and the 6th (#181 - 216) sheets. I have never seen the 5th (#145 - 180)......the toughest group of cards in this 1949 set. And, I have a "simulated" 7th sheet arrangement that includes 8 (of the 12) variations. Therefore, the placement of 32 of the 36 cards are confirmed on this sheet. If I can find my photo of this simulated arrangement I'll post it. TED Z

Archive

08-11-2007, 02:52 PM

Posted By: Dave HornishThis is from the original Sevchuk find that was used to reconstruct the low # sheets in Baseball Cards magazine about 25 years ago. One of the best pieces in my collection: <img src="http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p280/dsh46/53uncuttoppsstrip.jpg">

Archive

08-11-2007, 08:15 PM

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisPartial uncut panel with the very scarce #68 card...."Ted signs for 1959". <img src="http://www.freephotoserver.com/v001/tedzan/fleertw68.jpg"> TED Z

Archive

08-11-2007, 08:23 PM

Posted By: leon<img src="http://luckeycards.com/pruncberkross1951panel.jpg">

Archive

08-11-2007, 09:43 PM

Posted By: AnthonyEgad! Leon owns cards manufactured after Roosevelt was president? Teddy Roosevelt? Here's a '71 high number sheet <img src="http://photos.imageevent.com/griffins/uncutsheets/large/71Topps.tif.jpg"> and a '66 panel with Koufax <img src="http://photos.imageevent.com/griffins/uncutsheets/icons/66sheet.tif.jpg">

Archive

08-12-2007, 09:23 AM

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisThis scan is a partial view of a complete 36-card 1950 Bowman sheet. <img src="http://www.freephotoserver.com/v001/tedzan/bowman50lf.jpg"> TED Z

Archive

08-12-2007, 02:51 PM

Posted By: Bob C 2I love that 71 Topps 6th series sheet! Does anybody have a scan of the second sheet from that series to post? I just started re-building a '71 set and I'm curious about the nature of the so-called short prints in the high number series.

Archive

08-12-2007, 06:10 PM

Posted By: AnthonyNIce '50 sheet Ted! I was looking thru some Mastro catalogs from '00-'02 last nite, and that sheet came up a few times, in one case twice in one auction. But since then they have totally dried up. I picked up 2 of the '48 sheets with the common 36 cards in the last month, but have yet to see one with the short prints included. Have you ever seen one of those?

Archive

08-12-2007, 06:16 PM

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisIf you are interested in my VCBC article on the 1949 Bowman color errors, email me your mailing address and I'll send you a copy. tedzan11@comcast.net TED Z

Archive

08-14-2007, 01:55 PM

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisANTHONY Take a look again at the 1948 Bowman sheet that I have posted. It is exactly the one you are asking about. Cards #37 - 48 are interspersed on this 36-card sheet. TED Z

Archive

08-14-2007, 02:07 PM

Posted By: AnthonyTed- I looked at the sheet you posted, and I've got 2 of the exact same one. It was my understanding that there are 12 short prints in the set, none of which are pictured on either of our (yours and mine, not the Dorskind "our" ) sheets. My question is have you ever seen or have a sheet with the other 12 cards from the set?

Archive

08-14-2007, 02:10 PM

Posted By: Paul STed Z - email sent a few days ago. Thanks.

Archive

08-14-2007, 03:16 PM

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisI received your email and will send you a copy of my 1949 Bowman article when I am home. I am on the road now using my laptop, TED Z

Archive

08-14-2007, 03:34 PM

Posted By: Ted ZanidakisANTHONY In recent years, there are two schools of thought as to which 12 cards are tougher in the 1948 BB set. The 12 cards of the 1st series of cards printed on the sheet numbered 1-36....or, the last 12 cards in the set numbered 37-48 (that replaced the first 12). We really don't know how many press runs were of the 1st 36 cards vs how many press runs of the 2nd series sheets containing the 12 Hi#s. And, you are correct when you say that uncut sheets of the 1st series (#1-36) are seldom seen. I'm not sure why this is. TED Z

Archive

08-15-2007, 11:59 AM

Posted By: Paul SI was flipping through a 1982 Yankee Yearbook and came across a sheet of 51 Bowman (Topps)reprints. Actually it contains cards and anachronisms (e.g., Killebrew)that are obviously not 51 bowman but the style is as close as I can come. It is attached to the binding and folds open to reveal 18 cards numbered sequentially; 9 are Yankees. I don't really know much about reprints. Any additional info anyone has is appreciated. Partial scan below (Apologies for any stretching of the board rules.) <img src="http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z26/pspec/topps_51BowmanReprint.jpg"> edited for scan and text wrap margins

Archive

08-16-2007, 08:59 AM

Posted By: John MoranBob c, as requested. Let me know if you want me to email you the other 71 sheets, John. <img src="http://mywebpage.netscape.com/jmoran19j/71highA.jpg">

Archive

08-16-2007, 11:29 AM

Posted By: IggyHere is mine, although it is a partial sheet. I picked this one up from JHUSTLE way back in Ebay's infancy. <img src="http://img.auctiva.com/imgdata/3/9/9/9/7/7/webimg/64213791_o.jpg">

Archive

08-16-2007, 01:05 PM

Posted By: AnthonyHere's a couple more, just to keep things moving! A '72 Topps full sheet: <img src="http://photos.imageevent.com/griffins/uncutsheets/large/72Topps.tif.jpg"> Here's a '71 OPC sheet. I've never collected OPC sets, so I was really surprised to see the differences between the OPC cards and the Topps issue of the same year. Different bios, team info, etc and the color on the OPC is so much more intense and saturated than the US product. Is this typical, or did I get an oversaturated sheet? The second sheet came with the tape on it (right thru Ryan, of course) and I don't want to mess with it. Definitely a job for Kevin Saucier. <img src="http://photos.imageevent.com/griffins/uncutsheets/large/71OPC1.tif.jpg"> <img src="http://photos.imageevent.com/griffins/uncutsheets/large/71OPC2.tif.jpg"> And a '71 Topps Super sheet. I won this in a Lelands auction about 3 years ago (there were 2 in the lot, if anyone wants to trade I've got an extra) and it was described as a '70 sheet. All they had to do was turn the damn thing over. I called and wrote numerous times complaining, but never heard back from them. Typical Lelands. 18 HOFers, plus Rose, and Torre who are HOF caliber. <img src="http://photos.imageevent.com/griffins/uncutsheets/large/71Super1.tif.jpg">

Archive

08-16-2007, 06:16 PM

Posted By: Dave HornishHere's one off the beaten path-cardboard version of the Action Emblems: <img src="http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p280/dsh46/actionemblemproofsheet.jpg">

Archive

08-19-2007, 02:49 PM

Posted By: Bob C 2John M, Thanks for sharing the '71 Topps series 6 sheet. I'd love to see others (rwcollet@roadrunner.com). In the first '71 T sheet posted, is the checklist card #619, actually in the run of 5th series numbers? Thanks. Bob C

Archive

03-30-2009, 01:15 PM

Posted By: Anthony N.I was looking for this thread to see the '49 sheet of Ted's with the gray background variation, but it looks like the scan is gone. Ted, any chance you can repost it? Anyone got any new sheets or panels since this was first posted?