PDA

View Full Version : just got this email from mile high-topps plaks


Archive
11-19-2008, 09:03 AM
Posted By: <b>marty q</b><p> <br><br>The Mile High 1968 Topps Plaks Find<br><br>November 18, 2008 <br><br>From the perspective of a standard-issue company set collector, 1968 was not a great year for The Topps Company. More PSA 10s have surfaced from the lackluster 1968 Topps Baseball set, for example, than from every other Topps Baseball issue of the entire 1960s combined. Frankly, they're just not that tough, and toughness is the defining characteritic of a sustainable collectible. But don't disparage the Topps gang for taking it too easy in 1968.<br><br><br><br>That year, true to the zeitgeist of the times, Topps set into motion a wide-ranging series of experiments unlike anything they'd ever attempted before, with production ranging from Deckle Edge Proofs to Color Player Posters, from 3-Dimentional Tests to Topps Discs, to game cards, tip books, and stickers. Just as other American industries responded to the rampant turmoil of 1968 with an unprecedented level of &quot;countercultural&quot; productions, it was clearly a creative time at Topps.<br><br><br><br>Among the most experimental Topps test issues of 1968 were the &quot;All Star Baseball Plaks.&quot; Virtually unknown to most collectors today, Topps Plaks are bronze-colored plastic busts of two dozen stars of the late '60s issued in three-player sprues, like model airplane parts, along with one of two checklists and two sticks of bubblegum in a ten-cent wax pack. The checklist cards feature photos of the 24 players presumed to have been included in the set, and they are far easier to locate today than the actual Plaks. In fact, so scarce are the plastic busts that no one has yet been able to confirm the existence of all 24 checklisted players. <br><br>Until now.<br><br><br><br>Acting on a phone call from a couple outside of Scranton, Pennsylvania, Brian Drent, founder and President of Mile High Card Company, recently traveled to The Topps Company's former hometown to examine what he'd been told was a pile of plastic baseball parts produced sometime in the late '60s. The owner's mother had worked at the Topps factory for a number of years and would occasionally treat the neighborhood kids to free candy and miscut cards. She also had permission to take home any of the failed test issues, as she did with an armful of Topps Plaks wax packs. She quickly learned, however, what Topps management had already concluded, that what kids wanted most was cards and candy, that you couldn't really flip a plastic bust, and that they had no negotiable street value. So she put them in a bucket on a shelf in her garage where they sat for the next forty years.<br><br><br><br>Mile High Card Company is now pleased to announce a public offering of what is arguable the most significant Topps find since Alan Rosen's discovery of 6,000 1952 Topps high number in 1986, which included 75 Mickey Mantles. What separates Drent's Plaks from Rosen's find, however, is a matter of numbers. Whereas Rosen needed a few boxes to haul away his treasure, Drent swears he could have stuffed the Plaks, every last one of them, into the admittedly spacious confines of his winter coat pockets. Several players, in fact, are represented by as few as just four examples, all of which may be the only four to exist.<br><br><br><br>The Mile High Plak find is significant for a number of reasons, but primarily because it helps to clear up several questions concerning the checklist. From the 24 players slated for production, no collector with whom we've spoken has ever seen a single example of Aaron, Drysdale, Mays, Peters, or Frank Robinson, and it is our belief that they were simply never produced. As far as we can tell, every player in the set can be found in two separate three-player sprues, save for Pete Rose, who only appears in one sprue arrangement, and another five players-Davis, Hunter, Killebrew, Longborg, and Wynn-who all appear on three different sprues. We believe that these five players, for whatever reason, took the place of the notorious five whose existence, after weeks of telephone calls to the hobby's most prolific collectors, we still cannot confirm.<br><br><br><br>The checklist to the 1968 Topps &quot;All Star Baseball Plaks&quot; test issue is therefore more likely complete at (19):<br><br><br><br> 1. Max Alvis<br><br> 2. Dean Chance<br><br> 3. Jim Fregosi<br><br> 4. Frank Howard<br><br> 5. Jim Hunter<br><br> 6. Al Kaline<br><br> 7. Harmon Killebrew<br><br> 8. Jim Longborg<br><br> 9.Mickey Mantle<br><br>10. Carl Yastrzemski<br><br>11. Richie Allen<br><br>12. Orlando Cepeda<br><br>13. Robert Clemente<br><br>14. Tommy Davis<br><br>15. Tim McCarver<br><br>16. Ron Santo<br><br>17. Rusty Staub<br><br>18. Pete Rose<br><br>19. Jim Wynn<br><br><br><br>Since acquiring the Plaks, the staff at Mile High has been diligently scouring every major auction catalog in our research library and has been unable to locate a single record of a 1968 Topps Plaks sale. We've also spoken with numerous collectors, two of whom identified themselves as experts on this scarce issue. Together, we determined that the only known examples to come to market within the last decade occurred earlier in 2008 when Kit Young Cards auctioned off (8) common single players on eBay in separate lots, av eraging $1000 per sale. Testing the market, Mile High also released (7) singles on eBay in late October of this year, and the results were the same. In short, we believe the Topps Plaks to be the second or third scarcest, non-proof, Topps test issue ever produced, behind only to the 1961 Topps Dice Game and, debatedly, the 1967 Topps Stand-Ups, which, in an uncanny way, are quite similar to the Plaks.<br><br><br><br>One final note of interest that potential collectors should bear in mind concerns one of the key issues from the set, Mickey Mantle. Upon sorting our small find and attempting to understand the mysterious absence of the five aforementioned players, we discovered that, while the bust for each player is consistent in shape and size, there exist two distinct Mantle variations. The first displays a slanted, interlocking &quot;NY&quot; on Mick's cap, as opposed to a perfectly square logo on the second. Mick's lips, nose and ear are also of noticeably larger proportions on the first, and the placement of his right eye and the width of his collar also vary to a degree well outside the bounds of manufacturing error. No doubt, they came from distinct molds. So, while a very good question to ask an advanced Topps collector may be: do you own a Mantle Plak? - a better question would now be: do you own, or have you ever even seen, a Mantle Plak variation, or more precisely, the &quot;Big Nose&quot; variation.<br><br><br><br> <br><br><br><br>The 1968 Topps Plaks Mickey Mantle &quot;Big No se&quot; variation, left shows considerable enough variation to assume that it came from a distinct mold before Topps decided to scrap the project. Confirming the scarcity of this test issue, such variation suggests that the Topps gang had yet to finalize the design before terminating the project.<br><br><br><br>Below is a list of Mile High's 1968 Topps Plaks available for sale, in both single player form, as well as in three-player sprues.<br><br> <br><br><br><br> <br><br><br><br>Single Player Form<br><br> <br><br>Max Alvis<br><br> $750<br><br> <br><br>Dean Chance<br><br> $750<br><br> <br><br>Jim Fregosi<br><br> $1000<br><br> <br><br>Frank Howard<br><br> $850<br><br> <br><br>Jim Hunter<br><br> $1500<br><br> <br><br>Al Kaline<br><br> $1500<br><br> <br><br>Harmon Killebrew<br><br> $1500<br><br> <br><br>Jim Longborg<br><br> $850<br><br> <br><br>Mickey Mantle<br><br> $6250<br><br> <br><br>Carl Yastrzemski<br><br> $2500<br><br> <br><br>Richie Allen<br><br> $850<br><br> <br><br>Orlando Cepeda<br><br> $1350<br><br> <br><br>Roberto Clemente<br><br> $1500<br><br> <br><br>Tommy Davis<br><br> $750<br><br> <br><br>Tim McCarver<br><br> $850<br><br> <br><br>Ron Santo<br><br> $1000<br><br> <br><br>Rusty Staub<br><br> $1000<br><br> <br><br>Pete Rose<br><br> $2500<br><br> <br><br>JimWynn<br><br> $750<br><br> <br><br><br><br>Three Player S prues<br><br> <br><br>Yaz, Killebrew, Clemente<br><br> $8500<br><br> <br><br>Killebrew, Longborg, Davis<br><br> $3000<br><br> <br><br>Mantle, Hunter, Longborh (Big Nose)<br><br> $15,000<br><br> <br><br>Allen, Fregosi, Mantle (Small Nose)<br><br> $15,000<br><br> <br><br>Wynn, Clemente, Santo<br><br> $6500<br><br> <br><br>Killebrew, Cepeda, Howard<br><br> $3800<br><br> <br><br>Alvis, Chance, McCarver<br><br> $2000<br><br> <br><br>Santo, McCarver, Staub<br><br> $2300<br><br> <br><br>Hunter, Wynn, Kaline<br><br> $3800<br><br> <br><br>Hunter, Rose, Kaline<br><br> $6000<br><br> <br><br>Davis, Wynn, Allen<br><br> $2000<br><br> <br><br><br><br>If you are interested in purchasing any of these rare plaks, pl ease call (303) 840-2784 or email mhcc@milehighcardco.com<br><br><br><br>You have received this e-mail as a customer of Mile High Card Company who has previously joined our mailing list. If you received this in error, we apologize. If you wish to unsubscribe from our email service, please click here to unsubscribe.

Archive
11-19-2008, 12:19 PM
Posted By: <b>Randy Trierweiler</b><p>Nice going Larry, your theory was right on once again, just like the Punchouts. Very good research on your part. <br><br>What a great find too!!<br><br>Randy

Archive
11-19-2008, 04:07 PM
Posted By: <b>Dave Hornish</b><p>I just saw that myself. Very impressive find and good job on Larry's part and I stand corrected. Interesting that a little old lady could be the source of so many Topps oddball issues!

Archive
11-20-2008, 04:52 AM
Posted By: <b>Dave Hornish</b><p>Crazy stuff. Any ideas why the unfolded display box I have a scan of is for the Canadian (OPC) market? Were these sold in Canada too?<br><br><img src="http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p280/dsh46/68plaksdisplayboxunfolded.jpg" alt="[linked image]">

Archive
11-20-2008, 05:32 AM
Posted By: <b>larry</b><p>hi<br>im still not 100% on plaks but the theory fits very well<br>12 triple plaks<br>7 singles 7 doubles and 5 triples<br>the 5 triples would have been 5 doubles and 5 singles<br>making 12 singles and 12 doubles which is what one would have ezpected from 12 triple plaks<br>toppstest seems to have done things in multiples of 3<br>18 dice<br>tr1ple plaks that should have been 24<br>triple punchouts making 195<br>24 '67 stand-ups<br><br>

Archive
11-20-2008, 05:51 AM
Posted By: <b>Dave Hornish</b><p>Larry-series of 3 is an excellent observation! It also fits the inserts from this era to a degree. 11 is a big number for regular issues or standard size cards but the rule of 8 looks pretty good for the tests in general.