PDA

View Full Version : 1974 Topps Braves team card variation


Archive
08-26-2008, 10:03 AM
Posted By: <b>Bob Lemke</b><p><img src="http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r234/goldflamedpt/Custom%20Card%20Creations%201955%20style/eBay%20stuff/apskybolt.jpg"><br /><br /><img src="http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r234/goldflamedpt/Custom%20Card%20Creations%201955%20style/eBay%20stuff/apskynobolt.jpg"><br /><br />One of my old catalog-days contact, Bob Bazzell from Kentucky, asked me <br />about a variation in 1974 Topps, card #483 Atlanta Braves team card. He <br />has a card that shows what, for lack of a more accurate term, appears <br />to be a lightning bolt in the sky at top-right. His other two cards <br />don't have that "bolt." <br /><br />My examination of the "With Bolt" <br />cards shows there is dot structure within the white streak, indicating <br />the streak was present when the original team pix was half-toned for <br />the printing process. The "No Bolt" card appears, therefore, to be a <br />correction, not only eliminating the "bolt," but touching up the sky <br />color around it, replacing the purple hues with blue.<br /><br />Justin Moen of the current Standard Catalog staff, asked me if I felt <br />this was worthy of inclusion in the big book. I told him my personal <br />opinion was, "No," but that I'd get the information out to this forum <br />to solicit your thoughts.<br /><br /><br />

Archive
08-26-2008, 02:31 PM
Posted By: <b>larry</b><p>bob<br />any help in getting this forwarded to fluckinger appreciated<br />i dont seem to be able to contact him<br />gilliam reese and hodges are now known<br />maybe only 1 of each but they exist<br /><img src="http://i266.photobucket.com/albums/ii277/sflayank/100_0010.jpg">

Archive
08-27-2008, 02:56 PM
Posted By: <b>Anonymous</b><p>Personally that looks more like printing flaw than a variation. I guess the real question is how many exist of the variations.<br /><br />It reminds me of the "green bat" variation in the 1967 set (Schall?) or the "finger" variations in the 1981 Fleer set. More an anomoly than a legitimate variation.<br /><br />But that's just one collectors thoughts.

Archive
08-27-2008, 04:28 PM
Posted By: <b>Dave Hornish</b><p>I say printing problem as well.

Archive
09-01-2008, 06:26 PM
Posted By: <b>Al</b><p>Printing defect....but then again, so is the Herrer and the Bakep and the Campos black star...and many others already listed